Check our Sword Shop

Our content features commercial links to our products, committed to transparent, unbiased, and informed editorial recommendations. Learn More

One-Handed vs Two-Handed: Sword Types, History and Combat

Written By: David Mickov
Published On: January 13, 2024
Edited by: Juliana Cummings

NO AI USED This Article has been written and edited by our team with no help of the AI

One and two-handed swords are bladed, edged weapons of war used with either one or two hands based on their hilt sizes. They originated worldwide, and their usage differs, drastically impacting everything about the blade, from aesthetics to function. While being unique, both types of swords have positive and negative attributes. 

This article will examine the differences between these two types of swords, which go beyond the size of the hilt. 

Swords fall into a one or two-handed category, predominantly in European styles due to varied hilt designs.
The first in history, one-handed swords were compact, versatile, and ideal for use with shields in battle. They measure 20-49 inches (50-125 cm) and weigh 1.3-3.1 lbs (0.7-1.4 kg).
Emerging during the 2nd century CE, two-handed swords offered greater reach and power. They ranged from 47-67 inches (120-170 cm) and weighed between 2.2-5 lbs (1-2.3 kg).

Terms, Types, Characteristics, and Design Differences 

One Handed Vs Two Handed Swords Characteristics
A one-handed arming sword and a two-handed longsword – Credits: Albion Swords

One-handed swords are blades that can be used with a single hand, whereas two-handed swords can be used with both. They are named as such due to their combat techniques. However, both can be held with one or two hands in some cases.

Some swords can be used with one or two hands when necessary. In Europe, they are often called bastard swords or hand-and-a-half swords. 


One-Handed Swords
One Handed Sword Comparison
Two-Handed Swords
Two Handed Sword Comparison
Arming SwordZweihander
Viking SwordClaymore
European SaberRhomphaia
CinquedeaBastard Sword
RapierSwiss Saber
Celtic SwordsSpadone
SpathaBoar Swords
ShashkaExecutioner Sword

Some one-handed swords offer little to no protection and should be used with a shield in combat, whereas others excel as dueling weapons. They also vary in terms of their slashing or thrusting capability depending on the type of hilt.

Two-handed swords are also different from each other. Some of them are greatswords and only used as situational tools. Some have polearm-like hilts that give them the advantage of a sword-like spear.

Looking for a Two-Handed Sword?
Windlass logo
Ronin Katana Logo
Paul Chen Hanwei Logo
Kingston Arms Logo
Red Dragon Armoury Logo
Dragon Sword Logo
From $218 up to $650
Two Handed Swords Collection


One Handed vs Two Handed Sword Characteristics 1
The difference between blades and hilt sizes of one and two-handed swords

Both sword groups have straight blades that end with a pointed or slightly rounded tip and one or two sharpened edges.

Their blades, such as the unsharpened ricasso, can feature two sets of grooves, which reduce the sword’s general weight, making them easier to handle.

The blades of one-handed swords are generally shorter to correspond to their smaller hilts, although exceptions like the European rapier do exist.

The average blade length of a one-handed sword is between 18 and 35 inches (45 and 90 cm), while the two-handed blade can reach a colossal 51-inch mark (130 cm).

Some two-handed swords were massive and, at times, purely ceremonial, boasting their user’s masculinity due to their larger size. In some cases, however, they were constructed to be effective in actual combat. An example is the two-handed executioner sword, which was heavy with a dull tip but was used specifically for decapitation.


Main Roman Maintz Gladius Sword by Legacy Arms Gladius
The hilt of a one-handed sword, the “Roman Maintz gladius sword“, with ridges allowing for a  firm grip

The one-handed sword’s hilt is shorter and often made in direct proportion to the user’s hand. It can feature a larger pommel to give it back support along with its guard.  

Two-handed hilts are larger and usually able to accommodate both hands snuggly, while others give enough space between the hands for more versatility. 

The average one-handed handle is between four and six inches (10 to 15 cm), while two-handed handles range from 8 to 16 inches (20 to 41 cm).

Looking for a One-Handed Sword?
Paul Chen Hanwei Logo
Windlass logo
Ronin Katana Logo
Kingston Arms Logo
APOC Swords Logo
Legacy Arms Logo
From $75 up to $695
One Handed Swords Collection

Handles can be made from quality tightly wrapped silk, leather, or wire cords to give the two-handed user more leverage and security. Handles can also feature a ridge or bump in the center.

One-handed hilts have more complex guards offering protection due to their shorter reach. The style of this guard varies from metal bars, full or half baskets, or cruciform quillons, while some swords have no guard.

Some swords do not have a complex guard or any guard, so the user’s flexibility isn’t compromised in combat—for example, the Cossack shashka.


Carrying a one handed or two handed sword in a Scabbard
Carrying a two-handed sword with a downward-facing pommel – Credits: Paul Chen Hanwei

The one-handed sword inside its scabbard often hangs from the user’s waist. While most hang from the left side, the gladius hangs from the right. 

Two-handed swords can also be carried on the waist, but this is less practical. They can also be handheld, rest on one’s shoulder like a rifle, or be strapped to the user’s back. 

One-handed swords were popular in Europe throughout history due to their practicality of easily unsheathing from their scabbard. Being many soldiers’ only side arm or self-defense tool, it needed to be light and reliable. Some swords outside Europe, like the katana, tried to compensate for the two-handed unsheathing difficulty by being carried with its edge up.

Size and Weight

Montante Sword Title 1
The Iberian Montante Sword next to a banana

Two-handed swords are generally larger than one-handed swords and, therefore, heavier but not as awkward to hold with two hands. 

The length of a two-handed sword can range from 47 to 67 inches (120 to 170 cm). One-handed swords usually run between  20 to 49 (50 to 125 cm) inches. 

A two-handed sword’s weight ranges from 2.2 to 5 lbs (1 to 2.3 kg), while a one-handed sword ranges from 1.3 to 3.1 lbs (0.7 to 1.4 kg).

Two-handed swords aren’t necessarily slower as the weight and mass behind some of their blades increase their speed in the momentum of a slash but drastically reduce their recovery time after each strike.

Historical Significance and Impact

Carrying Two Handed Swords in History
Landsknecht mercenaries carrying two-handed swords supported on their shoulders – Credits: Alamy

Swords are bladed primary or sidearm weapons representing higher social status throughout history.

The first European swords were initially one-handed, limited by metallurgical capabilities, and made from bronze. This changed during the 12th to 6th century BCE with the introduction of iron.

Advancements in ironworking from the 3rd BCE to the 2nd CE led to the first real development of durable one-handed blades, such as the Roman gladius. These advancements also led to the use of practical two-handed swords, such as the Dacian/Thracian rhomphaia or falx.

Two-handed swords were situational and rare, with the biggest factor being the economic need. True two-handed swords emerged in these times of need in the post-ancient era and the Middle Ages, especially from the 15th century and beyond, with models such as the iconic longsword, claymore, or zweihander.

With the increase of armor, they gained some prevalence. However, with the decrease of armor and the introduction of firearms, one-handed single-edged swords remained globally dominant as they were lighter to carry, cheaper to create, easier to master, and could more adequately save one’s life in combat.

The curved one-handed European cavalry saber would become dominant and replace two-handed swords in practical use.
Initially, bronze one-handed swords were common. Later, two-handed swords emerged with metallurgical progress but were less practical and harder to master. Eventually, they gave way to one-handed single-edged swords.

Combat Preference

Versatility of One Handed vs Two Handed Swords
The versatility of a one-handed sword against a two-handed sword – Credits: Federico Malagutti

Two-handed swords had a bigger reach advantage due to their longer blades. They emphasized this advantage, combined with a bigger striking impact, and used it as their core in the techniques of attacking or defending.

Both types of swords were versatile in their own way. The two-handed were more capable of versatile offense or defense due to their larger hilt. One-handed swords allow for a free hand to carry a protective shield.

One-handed swords excel in tight-compact formation fighting, which made them popular throughout combat history.

They are also faster due to the shorter recovery time after each strike, with a smaller chance of the blade getting stuck on its target. The compact size of the one-handed sword made it easier to carry. One-handed swords have more room to adapt to certain combat situations. They are easier to unsheath and can be used from horseback or on foot, as well as in compact areas.

Each sword type is tailored for its role, with one-handed swords offering precision and two-handed swords providing reach. The European longsword is a notable example, combining the reach of a two-handed with the dexterity of a one-handed, making it uniquely versatile.
One Handed vs Two-Handed Swords (Duel Winner)
The better sword, one-handed or two-handed, varies based on fighting styles and historical impact. Historically, the one-handed sword had a greater influence, but in a duel between skilled users without shields or armor, the two-handed sword often wins, mainly due to its longer reach.
Sources Cited
  1. Burton, R. F. (1884, January 1). The Book of the Sword. London : Chatto & Windus.
  2. Grant, R. G. (2010, January 1). Warrior. Dk Pub.
  3. Woosnam-Savage, R. C. (2017, January 1). Arms and Armour of Late Medieval Europe.
  4. Oakeshott, E. (2001, January 1). Sword in Hand.
  5. Oakeshott, E. (2012, January 1). European Weapons and Armour. Boydell Press.
  6. Anglim, S. (2002, January 1). Fighting Techniques of the Ancient World 3000 BC – AD 500.
  7. Wilhalm, J. (2021, December 30). Renaissance Combat. Greenhill Books.
Get Weekly Insights on Everything Swords