Check our Sword Shop

Scimitar vs Sabre Swords: What Are the Main Differences?

Written By: David Mickov
Published On: January 22, 2024
Edited by: Juliana Cummings

Scimitars and sabers are some of the most popular terms in the sword community and modern media, such as video games. They are types of blades with similar characteristics, yet they function differently. With different backgrounds and cultures, they have both remained dominant throughout the 20th century.

This article will explain their terms, simplifying them as much as possible. We will also examine their defining characteristics and historical impact and suggest a possible duel winner.

Scimitar - Comparison
Sabre - Comparison
14th century Central/West/South Asia
17th century Europe
Warfare, Slashing, Slicing, Mounted or Foot
Warfare, Slashing, Thrusting, Mounted
Average Length
27.6 to 39.3 inches (75 to 100 cm)
27.6 to 43.3 inches (75 to 110 cm
1.5 to 2.6 lbs (0.7 to 1.2 kg)
1.5 to 2.6 lbs (0.7 to 1.2 kg)
Blade Type
Single-Edge, Strong Curve, Slim or Broadened Tip
Single-Edge, Curved, Straight, Broad or Slim
One-Handed, Protected
Wootz Steel, Damascus Steel, High-Carbon Steel
High-Carbon Steel
$150 – $500
$110 – $450
Where to Buy?

Terms, Characteristics, and Design Differences

Scimitar vs Sabre Characteristics and Differences
The major differences between Scimitar and Sabres

The term scimitar refers to an Eastern style of saber-like sword and may originate from the Italian word scimitarra, meaning a curved blade with a broadening tip. The term may also be derived from the Persian shamshir, meaning paw claw. Either way, the term scimitar translates to the sword in the native language.

The saber is a European blade with Turkish origins to the word selene. It also has Hungarian origins to the word szablya, and in Polish, it means szabla. The saber was first introduced to Eastern Europe, where it earned its name. The other term, saber, derives from the American standardization of spelling.

Today, saber refers to Western one-handed curved blades used throughout Europe after the Renaissance. The scimitar are one-handed curved blades with Islamic origins, such as the North African nimcha, Arabic saif, Turkish kilij, Afghanistan pulwar, Indian tulwar, and Persian shamshir.


Main Windlass British 1796 Pattern Light Cavalry Saber
The “British 1796 Light Cavalry Saber” with a broader slashing blade

The scimitar and saber feature a single-edged blade sharpened on one side, some with a double-edged tip called a false-edge. The tip can be under, perpendicular, or on top of the user’s hand.

The Eastern scimitar has a more drastic pronounced curve, with the shamshir blade being one of the most curved swords in history. Some scimitars like the kilij have a yelman, a broadening tip, making it more impactful in slashing.

Both swords can feature a fuller running near its spine or closer to the center to balance the weight. Their blades vary in width, such as a broader 1796 light cavalry saber or a slim Cossack shashka.

The European saber can be straight or have a pronounced curvature near the tip. Some feature broadening tips like a Hungarian saber, but most possess the same thickness and taper.


Main US Marine Corps Officers Saber from Spain
US Marine Corps Officer’s blade,” which follows the design of the scimitar-like Mameluke Sword

The scimitar and saber swords are one-handed weapons with firm handles sized to fit the human hand, usually between 2.4 to 4 inches (6 to 10 cm).

The scimitars comes in various styles, such as a pistol grip, sometimes known as a wolf handle, a curved pommel, or an Iranian straight with a broadened center held by a disc on the bottom.

Most scimitars feature a straight crossguard shaped like a diamond for protection and locking into the scabbard’s chape.

The European saber’s handle can be straight or curved, with a backstrap instead of a pommel. Most sabers feature the iconic D-style knuckle guard, while others have a semi-basket and a small quillon on the other side. 


Sheathing a Scimitar
Sheathing a shamshir scimitar inside its scabbard – Credits: Scholagladiatoria

The scimitar and saber are carried inside scabbards made of wood or metal, protecting the blade from harm.

Both are carried on a belt or strap on the left side. The European saber is sheathed by sliding the blade inside the opening. Some scimitars have an interlocking system that slides the blade inside from the side.

Size and Weight

Main Scimitar by Paul Chen Hanwei
Scimitar With a Deep Curve, Blunt” with a broadened yelman for a tip

A common length can range from 27.6 to 43.3 inches (75 to 110 cm), with some sabers being long enough to be useful in close quarters and calvary. 

Due to their light design, both offer quick strikes. The scimitar and saber weigh roughly 2 lbs (0.9 kg), depending on the type of hilt and the number of decorations.

Historical Significance

Scimitar vs Sabre Historical Signficance 1
The Crusades (11th-13th century) was a time when saber scimitar-like swords were used – Credits: History Maps

The scimitar and European saber trace their origins to the Turko-Mongol saber, which existed as early as the 7th century CE  and was possibly influenced by the previous Chinese dao blades.

These early Turkish curved blades traveled great distances with the nomadic tribes, used by mercenaries or for conquest such as the Avars, Seljuk Turks, and especially the Mongolian conquests (7th-13th centuries). 

The scimitar first appeared in Persia and India and gradually evolved to meet the needs of their lightly armored infantry and cavalry. Broad designs with curved blades were used during the Ottoman Empire from the 15th century onward.

The early European saber followed a design similar to the early Turkic blades. With time, they integrated with double-edged European swords and evolved while keeping their single-edged blades.

From Eastern Europe, sabers made their way to Western Europe and became dominant in the 17th century with the decrease of armor and increase of firearms and cavalry.

Today, they are still used in ceremonial contexts in contemporary armies and are one of the most popular HEMA (historical European martial arts) training tools.

The scimitar and European saber trace their origins to the Turko-Mongol blades inspired by Chinese single-edged Dao swords. They traveled from Asia to Europe and the Middle East as early as the 7th century. Evolving through the centuries, they became blades still used today.

Combat Preference

Scimitar vs Sabre Combat Preferences
Warriors wielding similar saber and scimitar swords while mounted on cavalry – Credits: Empire de Russie

The scimitar consists of blades predominantly used for slashing and light thrusting. These one-handed swords offer speed and rely on the user’s skill more than their physical prowess.

When combined with a shield, scimitars were utilized for infantry, but their real effectiveness was on horseback where it could deliver a lethal blow through gaps in armor backed up by the horse’s momentum.

Most scimitars relied on slicing attacks, producing large gashes like the shamshir while others, like the kilij, focused on the impact using a broadened tip.

European sabers were cut-and-thrust weapons, either straight or featuring a softer curve. These one-handed nimble weapons combined with a pistol were used on horseback.

The saber and scimitar excelled against unarmored foes, making them ideal melee weapons. Carried effortlessly, they were versatile whether with a shield, on horseback, or in a duel.

Scimitar vs Sabre (Duel Winner)
Each design of the scimitar and saber excelled in a certain type of combat while sacrificing another advantage. In our opinion, due to the appearance of a false edge, a slightly longer blade, a softer curve, and a hilt for protection, the European saber would be the victor in an unarmored duel to the death.
Sources Cited
  1. Brunswick, E. (2015, November 18). Historical European Martial Arts
  2. Evangelista, N. (1995, May 23). The Encyclopedia of the Sword. Greenwood.
  3. Burton, R. F. (2008, January 1). The Book of the Sword. Cosimo, Inc.
  4. Hutton, A. (2004, July 1). Cold Steel: a Practical Treatise on the Sabre (1889).
  5. Rivkin, K., & Isaac, B. (2017, April 1). A Study of the Eastern Sword.
  6. Nicolle, D. (2002, January 1). Warriors and Their Weapons Around the Time of the Crusades. Routledge.
  7. Nicolle, D. (1983, July 28). Armies of the Ottoman Turks 1300–1774. Osprey Publishing.
  8. Alexander, D. G. (2015, December 31). Islamic Arms and Armor in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Get Weekly Insights on Everything Swords